The High vs. Low PEEP Debate in Mechanical Ventilation: Are We Just Blowing Hot Air?

In the world of mechanical ventilation, few topics spark as much debate—and as many eye rolls—as the discussion around PEEP settings. Yes, that’s right, we’re talking about Positive End-Expiratory Pressure, the setting that keeps our patients’ lungs open, their oxygen levels up, and our Journal and conferences locked in never-ending debates. But while some clinicians treat this debate like it’s a life-and-death matter (because, well, it kind of is), let’s take a moment to breathe deeply and look at the High vs. Low PEEP controversy with a bit of humor. After all, who says we can’t laugh at ourselves since we really don’t know

The High PEEP Advocates: More is More, Right?

If you’ve ever met a High PEEP enthusiast, you know they’re a passionate bunch. For them, cranking up the PEEP is akin to turning up the volume on your favorite song—louder is always better. They argue that higher PEEP levels keep the alveoli open, improve oxygenation, and prevent the dreaded atelectasis from rearing its ugly head. And, in many cases, they’re right. For patients with severe ARDS, a higher PEEP can indeed make the difference between life and death.

But let’s be honest—High PEEP proponents can sometimes take it a bit too far. It’s as if they believe that more pressure will magically solve every problem, much like the guy at the gym who thinks adding more weight to the bar will instantly turn him into the Hulk. But here’s the thing: while High PEEP can be a powerful tool, it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. There are risks, like barotrauma and hypotension, that can make this approach a double-edged sword. So, while we applaud their enthusiasm, maybe it’s time to dial it back just a notch. Not every patient needs to feel like they’re in a wind tunnel.

The Low PEEP Loyalists: Less is More (And Also Safer)

On the other side of the battlefield, we have the Low PEEP loyalists—those who believe that when it comes to PEEP, less is definitely more. For them, the idea of pumping high pressures into delicate lung tissue is as appealing as putting pineapple on pizza (a practice that sparks its own set of heated debates: The Hawaiians ruined the Pizza according to Anger from Inside Out)).

Low PEEP advocates argue that keeping PEEP low reduces the risk of barotrauma, minimizes the potential for hemodynamic instability, and generally makes life easier for the lungs. And they’ve got sorta a little point.

Low PEEP settings are often preferred for patients with conditions like COPD or when there’s a concern about blood pressure dropping faster than a Wi-Fi signal during a Zoom meeting. The Low PEEP approach is all about caution, careful monitoring, and avoiding the pitfalls of too much pressure. It’s the respiratory equivalent of the “minimalist” movement—why add more when less will do just fine?

The Gray Area: Why the Debate is Far From Over

Of course, as with most things in life, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. The High vs. Low PEEP debate isn’t black and white—it’s more like fifty shades of gray, each with its own clinical nuances. Patient variability, underlying conditions, and real-time monitoring mean that what works for one patient might not work for another. It’s like trying to find the perfect temperature for your shower—everyone’s got their own sweet spot.

But wait, how about the science, the prospective studies, the meta analysis, the Biblical societies guidelines, the PEEP-FiO2 tables. Those solved the problem and ended the debate right ? I’ll leave you to laugh at that for a little bit…..

The reality is that the High vs. Low PEEP debate is as much about philosophy as it is about physiology. Some clinicians are risk-takers, willing to push boundaries for the sake of better oxygenation. Others prefer a more conservative approach, focusing on steady, reliable outcomes. And both sides have valid points. So, while we may never fully resolve the debate, it’s important to keep the conversation going. Because in the end, what really matters is doing what’s best for the patient in front of us—even if it means admitting that maybe, just maybe, we’re all just blowing a little hot air.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share on Social Media
Follow us on Social Media